Why is Teamwork Important - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1309 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Public Relations Essay Type Argumentative essay Did you like this example? Why teamwork is important Obviously we are referring to teams that cooperate and produce outcomes, teams that hit their mark; teams that work. We are referring to consorts, to bands of partners and to associates bound within a vision. This kind of teamwork is of prominent importance. An obvious, maybe rhetorical and definitely self-evident thesis that all of us share. In this text lies a venture to inductively disseminate, support, analyze and qualitatively define the underlying mechanism and the intrinsic meaning behind and beyond the self-evident nature of this statement. The goal of nature is abundance, whereas in business it is growth. These two concepts are different aspects of the same. Growth in business is an indicator of abundance, it is the tangible statement that we are doing things right and if this growth is sustainable, that we hold the one-way ticket to our organization’s permanence. There are many quantitative methods to regulate and s crutinize growth whereas it is one of the main anchors of notice with respect to financial analysis. At the same time corporate finance has appointed a discrete knowledge segment on sustainable growth. Greiner’s growth model, an effective qualitative instrument in managing said growth, the object of yet so many of our activities, analyzes six distinct phases that have to be monitored in order for an endeavor to grow and overcome respective crises and threats. All phases contain constituents wherein teamwork is important, but in the last two they are an absolute prerequisite, as growth is defined within these two phases by the responsiveness of teamwork and they are coined as â€Å"growth through collaboration† and â€Å"growth through alliances†. If we should seek out growth for our organization’s survival, thence we can only imagine the importance of teamwork, for the latter is a sine qua non of growth. One of Peter Drucker’s most famous quo tes is that in order to respond and perform in change we need joint performance through common goals and shared values, among other things. These shared values can be observed in the core of many successful management models, such as Mc Kinsey’s 7s framework: six separate elements orbit around the ever-important shared values that are our basic intangible fuel. For Geert Hofstede culture is the software of the world, and one of the major dimensions of culture is the track of individualism vs. collectivism. In the 70’s and 80’s American business was bent on finding out why Japanese operations are so successful, only to return with one definite and uncontested result: teamwork. When the world of business realized the necessity of departing from unequivocal Taylorist ideals and started to shift towards the human relations school, only a few main concepts were rooted in this change: those of employee involvement, synergies and socialization. Again, the force of t eamwork proved to provide the muscle for this evolution. Nowadays more than ever teamwork is considered as the main incentive vessel for employee commitment. Excellent firms hold a mechanism in place to promote group problem-solving and teamwork arrangements, whence the plurality of successful US firms is utilizing autonomous work teams to guide its everyday operations. Learning organizations with enviable core competencies and sustainable competitive advantages cannot come into being without a culture of sanctioning and promoting teamwork. As we can extract thus far, science has evolved to consider teams very important and successful business has put these ideas into practice. But maybe the scope is a bit broader. Maybe teamwork is important for life. Teamwork is about sharing (goals, workload, issues, all that is good and not so good, productive and counterproductive, functional and dysfunctional) and sharing is all about expression and truth: if we do not share our thoug hts, ideas, emotions and efforts then they rest enclosed in the individual that is us, do not enter the sphere of the explicit and thus, are not incarnated into the real. Sharing is the first step and the gateway to materializing our inner self and by extension our dreams. Sharing effectively and communicating with good faith are the vessels towards true and individual expression in this world. If we are interested in life and not in mere survival, thence sharing will provide the passport. So in this analytical approach we can already indicate an outstanding antithesis: in order to be individualistic and leave our personal mark in this world we need to share, we need our crew and we need to be players of a team. The argument above is further strengthened by the fact that human beings are nonetheless paradoxical creatures. We long to feel part of something bigger than us and at the same time that we alone are critical within a system. Teamwork provides the practical solution to th is basic paradox of man. We should as well need to rewind a bit and go back, back to the why and the what. Talking about humans and teams, reference should be made to the titan of all teams, that of family. A family has clear roles, purpose and beyond that, is the basic distinction of the human species. Some million years ago in Hominids, a strange thing occurred. The female lost its estrus, or at least the same estrus that was shared with the rest of the mammals. Thus dawned the era of romantic love, whence a female is able to select her partner based on her personal wants and not due to the predicate of nature. At the same time man is able to provide for this basic unit of existence, his family and both mom and dad can be there for their child, to nurture and educate it for its life to come; through teamwork. This fact that is true up to and including the present day is the basic comparative advantage of the human species. Without a doubt we can state that our existence and sur vival is owed to teamwork. So we can conclude that the thesis â€Å"teamwork is important† is an obvious understatement as it turns out, for teams are not only important in business; teams make up the reason for success in life. We may go so far as to state that teams are of such importance due to the fact that teamwork is a necessity clearly inscribed in our genome and materializes as one of our basic needs, equal to that of food and shelter. In a ship, we have an up to a fault (that is, for its totality lies isolated for a specific time frame) well-defined system. Within its hull there are individuals working and living towards a common purpose, that of the journey. Beyond its physical boundary, even in clear skies whence Aeolus and Poseidon are very merciful, lies the abyss. This within itself provides the manifestation of the distinction that governs the maritime industry (and is a fact that follows each maritime firm even within its brick and mortar installations a nd terrestrial activities); to return to our first point, if within these well-defined boundaries there not lies a family (with clear structure, size, roles and obligations but a family nonetheless), the journey and thus the mission will not proceed as streamlined. The intricacies of this dynamic synergy strike a sensitive chord within us as they border on the ideal. Science and technology are able to provide the medium to further our understanding and to optimize nearly all constituents of our industries, but without grasping that humans are core and that teamwork is all that makes us human, any application will be sterile. Effectiveness cannot surface without the aid of a team and collectiveness. This is true for all industries, but does not hold the same weight for each and every one, for there are some human activities that teamwork comprises an essential catalyst for success. The ancient quote that unity makes strength is of distinguished fortitude whence reflecting the mari time industry. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Why is Teamwork Important?" essay for you Create order

The Reagan And Thatcher Governments Influenced American...

Along with their successors, the Reagan and Thatcher governments influenced American and British politics for the majority of the 1970s and 1980s. They both agreed for free-market economics and were disapproved with the ‘Great Society’. The political change created new variety of social policy commentators which included crime and justice. Individuals differed politically. Individuals who were on the right were supportive towards free-market criticisms on previous measures compared to those individuals whom were on the left who were critical of free-market economics and related political concepts. They were also critical of what they believed to be unhelpful (Newburn, 2009). In criminology, ‘realism’ is involved with the view that ‘crime’ is the outcome if known real-world causes. Realists are concerned with the forces that lead to crime perpetration instead of with how crime is defined. Right realists whom are inspired by James Q. Wilson (1985) argue that a lack of self-control is what causes crime. Individuals commit crime because they are rewarded with financial, material or emotional rewards. Left realists whom were inspired by Jock Young argue that interactions between social actors such as the police, the public, victims and offenders cause crime. In Young’s view, the effectiveness of policing is shaped by the link between the police and the public. The power of crime is formed by the link between the victim and the offender (O’Brien and Yar, 2008). Left realism is aShow MoreRelatedGeorge Thatcher s Influence On British Politics1884 Words   |  8 PagesMargret Thatcher was born on October 13, 1935. She went to college at Oxford University where she received a degree in chemistry. Later on she went to study law where she then was able to pass the bar. Years later, she ran for position in parliament and loss. After this lost, she went on to have kids and focus on her family. She then realized that after focusing on her family she still had a passion for government and she still wanted to get involve in British politic. She then took on various positionsRead MoreNew Right Conservatism2012 Words   |  9 PagesKingdom and United States, but like neighbouring New Zealand, the 1980s saw the Australian Labor Party initiate Third Way economic reforms, which bear some familiarity to New Right ideology. After the John Howard Coalition defeated 13-year Labor government at the 1996 federal election, economic reforms were taken further, some examples being wholesale labour market deregulation (e.g. WorkChoices), the introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST), the privatisation of the telecommunications monopolyRead MoreThe United Nations ( Un )1309 Words   |  6 Pagesrelations.† International regimes have the ability to change the nature of state interactions as well as providing solutions to intra-state wars. An international regimes ability to do this varies based on several different factors. These factors are influenced by the regimes foreign policy and their standing in the international community, as well as binding international treaties, such as NATO and the EU. A regimes military strength can also play a role in their ability to influence their ability toRead MoreEssay about The Modern Presidency:an Evolution3137 Words   |  13 Pagesinitial fulfillment during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. Under the stimulus of the New Deal, World War II, and the entrepreneurial leadership of Frankli n Roosevelt, there was a huge expansion of not only the president but of the federal government itself (Gelderman, 1997). This growth was further enhanced by the emergence of the United States as a world and nuclear power. These growths that helped make Franklin Roosevelt our first modern president were further solidified by Harry Truman andRead MoreParliamentary and Presidential Form of Government8135 Words   |  33 Pagesforms of Government in a democracy. In England there is the Parliamentary system, and it has worked so well over the years that it has become a model for a number of other countries. In the U.S.A., on the other hand, there is the Presidential form of executive, and it has been working quite successfully in that country. These two forms of government have their own distinctive characteristics, and their own respective merits and demerits. A parliamentary system is a system of government in which theRead MoreImmanuel Wallersteins World Systems Theory1893 Words   |  8 Pageshave a global culture or â€Å"global polity† that significantly influenced how nation-states and international organisations are formed and develop. The global culture helps to create the identity, purpose, behaviour and nature of these social units. Goran (2010, pp.35) described several waves of globalisation throughout human history. He describes how until 1750 Asia had been a significant rival to European hegemony. After the Franco-British seven years war Britain emerging as world s first global superpowerRead MorePre-Columbian Period9302 Words   |  38 Pagesare thought to have arrived in Alaska by crossing the Bering land bridge, at least 14,000 30,000 years ago.[10] Some of these groups migrated south and east, and over time spread throughout the Americas. These were the ancestors to modern Native Americans in the United States and Alaskan Native peoples, as well as all indigenous peoples of the Americas. Many indigenous peoples were semi-nomadic tribes of hunter-gatherers; others were sedentary and agricultural civilizations. Many formed new tribesRead MoreEssay on The History of Conflict in Ireland14775 Words   |  60 PagesThe History of Conflict in Ireland An American audience may find it difficult to comprehend the sense of history which is in the Irish conflict. It goes back to the 1920s when the island was partitioned, and Catholics in Northern Ireland believed that they were on the wrong side of that border, and believed that they had been done out of their political heritage. But Protestants have a sense of history which goes back to at least the seventeenth century, where fromRead MoreCompare and Contrast - Women5945 Words   |  24 Pageshome but are out making their own money. They now have the option to work at home or to go out and have a successful career, economy permitting. Women’s greatest victory over the past 100 years is probably the level of education widely available to American women. Education opens the doors and is in some ways the great equalizer in the job market. And even if a mother can’t stay home to raise her kids and trade mommy stories with friends and family, she is blessed with the miracle of the Internet toRead MoreImpact of Globalization and Bangladesh18126 Words   |  73 Pages.27 Logistics Infrastructure ..........................................................................................28 Effects of Government Decisions on FDI..............................................................30 Trade Policy of Bangladesh ...................................................................................30 v Eliminating Government Corruption and the Challenges of Law and Order ............... 32 General............................................................

Foreign Policy Can Be A Slippery Slope - 1844 Words

For Every Action, There is an Equal and Opposite Reaction Foreign policy can be a slippery slope, it’s difficult to have a policy between two diverse countries where their beliefs, values, and cultures are entirely different. As a result, when countries are entwined within a foreign policy, the decisions made may only benefit the very few people at the top. Unfortunately, when the leader of a country only takes their needs and wants into account and disregards policies to help make their country better domestically, problems will arise. As we saw through Taken Hostage, the tension of foreign policy between Iran and the U.S. was not a result of just one action, but instead the result of actions over the years. The Iranian people already had†¦show more content†¦Although the hostage crisis took place in 1979, the disapproval of the United States and Iran foreign relations took place over a century before the overthrow of the embassy. A major threat to the United States was the fear of the Soviets spreading their communist beli efs internationally. Due to this, the United States came to conclusion that the best way to stop the Soviets was to use a containment strategy (Cold War Intervention 1954). This entailed the United States doing what they thought was necessary to stop the spread of communism. Unfortunately, the prime minister of Iran at that time supported Soviet beliefs along with the idea of nationalism. The nationalist beliefs of the prime minister gave him the idea of nationalizing the Britain and American owned petroleum refineries in Iran, and god forbid someone touches the U.S. oil. With the fear of Soviet communism having an influence on Iran, the United States successfully completed a covert CIA operation that overthrew Mossaegh. Thus, replacing him with a pro-western Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who despised the Soviets just as much as the United States. With the new anti-communist Shah in place, the fear of the Soviets influencing Iran had finally subsided. However, even though the Unite d States needs were satisfied, American intervention with Iranian affairs was deeply resented. By the time of 1970 the Iranian people

Science vs. religion free essay sample

Word count 1351 Dawkins Analysis Science vs. Religion The following commentary investigates Is Science a Religion a piece written by Clinton Richard Dawkins, better known as Richard Dawkins, a British evolutionary biologist. Dawkins does not hesitate to share his views having authored several best sellers such as The Selfish Gene, The God Delusion, and The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing, as well as several others (ibid). In 1996 The American Humanist Association whose slogans include Good Without a God, and advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and free thinkers named Richard Dawkins Humanist of the Year (AHA). In response to Richard Dawkins piece, Is Science a Religion Dawkins wasted no time in his attack on faith insinuating the Aids virus and Mad Cow disease are less threatening to humanity than faith. Dawkins persist claiming, faith is one of the worlds greatest evils(l), Dawkins rapture continued on as he compared faith to the infectious Smallpox virus exclaiming faith would be harder to eliminate. We will write a custom essay sample on Science vs. religion or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page To further exploit Dawkins opinion he refers to faith as exceedingly dangerous and deems faith to be a brain virus. What is faith? To quote Mark Twain Faith is believing what you know aint so. The belief in the unknown, a person, place, or idea of which is not tangible and lacks any kind of factual evidence. Yet as Dawkins states faith is the principle vice of any religion(l). Could it be possible that organized religion is a way to control its faith driven believers? After all is it not true that God has done evil to people that have not followed his orders? For instance lets take a look at a couple examples. The Third of the 10 Commandments: You must not misuse the name of the Lord your God. In Ezekiel, Zedekiah makes a solemn oath made in the Lords name. When Zedekiah breaks that oath God said for breaking a solemn oath in the name of the Lord I God will capture Zedekiah, and put him on trial for treason and have all his best men killed. Did those men deserve to die? Is it right to punish and those men for another mans mistake? I think not. The seventh of 10 commandments: You must not commit adultery. In Samuel 2 David commits adultery with Bathsheba and gets Bathsheba pregnant, as a result of their punishment David and Bathshebas son dies. (Lee Andrew Henderson Yahoo Voices). This is not fair punishment, an innocent child put to death for anothers mistake. Not the kind of world I would want to occupy. Your life is at stake every time you interact with someone. How can anyone find it fitting to have faith in all this cruelty? It all Just appears to be too much evil to contend with. On the other side of that coin one might tend to agree with Dawkins when he says, Given the dangers of faith(l). I immediately thought of working mothers and the dilemma they are faced with when going back to work after having a child. Every mother on this planet, ho has had to leave her infant or toddler with a babysitter in order to go back to work, has had little but faith to carry her through her shift. For at that moment faith is all she can count on in hopes that she has made a wise decision in choosing a babysitter that will care for as well as, protect her child from harm. At a stressful time such as this even if one is not religious you can bet these new mothers are praying to God asking him to watch over her innocent child. There may not be anything scientific about this situation concerning faith, however, sometimes in life faith is all you have. One may not be able to grab it and hold on to it, although certain situations require you believe with all your heart that faith will carry you through, and more times than not it will. When someone came forward at one of Dawkins lectures and said, your science is just a religion like ours. Fundamentally, science Just comes down to faith, doesnt it? Dawkins replied Well science is not a religion and it doesnt Just come down to faith(l). Carrying his reply forward Dawkins assured his audience of the fact, science is based upon verifiable evidence. Religious faith not only lacks evidence, ts independence from evidence is its pride and Joy, shouted from the rooftops(l). Doubting Thomas, on the other hand, required evidence(l). As for the other apostles they were held in high standard, as without doubt, their faith was enough for them. Dawkins explains the reason for the comment referring to science being a religion. He feels he is hit with such comments because as he put it because I believe in evolution. I even believe in it with a passionate conviction(l), announces Dawkins. Dawkins claims science to be one of the most moral and honest disciplines in the orld today. With that being said it would appear that one must have faith in the reporting of evidence. James Randi a Canadian American stage magician and scientific skeptic best known for his challenging the supernatural, psychics, spoon benders, believe these kinds of people are paranormal trickster, and continue insinuating that scientist are fooled by these tricksters because of there deliberate dishonesty, in which scientists do not anticipate. In other words, ne is trying say that all scientists are 100% honest and on the up and up. That is hard to swallow. What is science? Science is most definitely based on a process known as the scientific method. The scientific method requires that the theory be testable. If the theory cannot be tested it cannot be a scientific theory. First is researching a phenomena by observation, formulate a hypothesis, test the hypothesis through experiments, establish theory based on repeated validation of evidence. With this evidence of validation, being available for the world to see via the internet and a library full of books there lays information in detailed explanation as to where the uman race came from, the world and its scientist have finally reached the point in which there remains no logical argument as all signs and research results scream Darwins natural selection theory to be valid. We no longer have to wonder how we came to be, despite color, race, or religion we humans that walk this earth are here as a result of evolution. This also applies to any living organism that can be found on this space we call earth. There may be a lot of opinions regarding Richard Dawkins some good some bad. His opinions regarding religion however maybe true or may not. One thing for sure is that if there is a Heaven and Hell we cannot come back and report on it. Nevertheless, that does not discount it as a possibility. I will believe it when I see it; this is my view on Heaven and Hell. Unfortunately, as a society we have that divided we stand outlook on science verses religion, its as if the believers of faith and the believers of evolution are football rivals, and neither side wants to lose the big game. From the view of the faith team, it is understandable that they want so much for the bible and all its promises to be valid. I mean who wouldnt ant to live a luxury existence with streets paved of gold. Or be welcomed with open arms at the pearly gates by their family members, of whom they have not seen in who knows how long. Viewing from the eyes of evolutionist, must be frustrating at the very least, especially all the work and long hours to provide factual evidence to the people only to be shunned. The school system teaching Creationism and not the Theory of Evolution is a straight slap in the face. Curiosity gets the best of me in the wonder of how many generations will it take before evolution is accepted as the answer of how did I get here.